What the Taliban Stand For 11/01/2009
The main point about my post on Pakistan was to be sober about the limits of American power. Big nations lose small wars precisely because of the problems we are having in Afghanistan. It has nothing to do with troop counts. It is because America has to win, while the Taliban only has to not lose. Our interests are asymmetrical- for the Taliban, its a matter of existence, for America- well, we're not exactly sure. Creating a legitimate, self-sustaining government under occupation is maddeningly difficult, as recent events make all too clear. And in Pakistan, what can the U.S. do? If Pakistan is unable or unwilling to destroy the Pakistani Taliban, the U.S. isn't going to invade Waziristan itself. The drone attacks can be useful, but they are ultimately a stopgap to make us feel like we have control in an area that in which we do not. The good news is that those who oppose the Taliban are on the right side of history. War strains the moral fiber and muddies the moral compass. But ultimately the Taliban are nothing more than philistine thugs who worship death and distort faith for their own ends. Al-Qaeda is cut from the same cloth, and for all its bluster, its mission has been a complete failure. Terrorist groups rarely last more than a couple of decades because they consume themselves. In the end, this is a battle of ideals, and the fundamentalist terrorists will not be the last ones standing. - Jon CommentsTue, 29 Dec 2009 20:33:50 Hi Jonathan, Leave a Reply |
RSS Feed