Voting on the Armenian Genocide 02/28/2010
Here we go again. The US House Foreign Affairs Committee is set to vote Thursday on a resolution recognizing the 1915 Ottoman massacres of Armenians as genocide.
A similar vote passed in 2007, but never came to a vote in the House of Representatives. Both the House of Representative and the Senate are composed of committees. Legislation must first pass relevant committees before being brought to a vote by the full House or Senate. For it to be brought to a full vote in the House, the Speaker of the House must schedule the vote. In the past, various presidential administrations coaxed the Speaker of the House into not bringing the bill up for a House-wide vote. This is what Bush did in 2007.
For any bill to become law, a similar process must occur in the Senate, and if bills pass both houses they must be reconciled to have the same language, voted on again, and then be sent to the President for signature. The President can veto the bill, sign it, or let it become law without his signature.
Obama campaigned that he would recognize the Armenian genocide. Ronald Reagan also publicly recognized the Armenian genocide without supporting legislation to recognize it. On April 15 last year (the day Armenians commemorate the killings), Obama used the Armenian words for Armenian genocide, without saying it in English.
In 2007, some American Jewish groups, eager to support the Turkish-Israeli relationship, helped to block the resolution recognizing the killings as genocide. After the decline in the Turkish-Israeli relationship since the Gaza War in 2009, look for this to change.
Obama himself has taken a lot of heat from domestic critics for not rhetorically supporting human rights strongly enough. This could be an opportunity to put those critics to rest. On the other hand, the Obama Administration has put a much higher priority on the Turkish-American relationship than the Bush Administration did, and Obama will need the Turks’ cooperation if he plans to withdraw from Iraq in 2011. Look for Obama to cave in.
It will also be interesting to see how Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu reacts to the vote in the Foreign Affairs Committee, which will almost certainly pass the resolution. Davutoglu has been radically revamping Turkish foreign policy to make it friendlier, but seems to have reached a roadblock on the Turkish-Armenian front. Expect him to make the argument that such a move by America would harm progress in talks to restart formal Turkish-Armenian relations.
A similar vote passed in 2007, but never came to a vote in the House of Representatives. Both the House of Representative and the Senate are composed of committees. Legislation must first pass relevant committees before being brought to a vote by the full House or Senate. For it to be brought to a full vote in the House, the Speaker of the House must schedule the vote. In the past, various presidential administrations coaxed the Speaker of the House into not bringing the bill up for a House-wide vote. This is what Bush did in 2007.
For any bill to become law, a similar process must occur in the Senate, and if bills pass both houses they must be reconciled to have the same language, voted on again, and then be sent to the President for signature. The President can veto the bill, sign it, or let it become law without his signature.
Obama campaigned that he would recognize the Armenian genocide. Ronald Reagan also publicly recognized the Armenian genocide without supporting legislation to recognize it. On April 15 last year (the day Armenians commemorate the killings), Obama used the Armenian words for Armenian genocide, without saying it in English.
In 2007, some American Jewish groups, eager to support the Turkish-Israeli relationship, helped to block the resolution recognizing the killings as genocide. After the decline in the Turkish-Israeli relationship since the Gaza War in 2009, look for this to change.
Obama himself has taken a lot of heat from domestic critics for not rhetorically supporting human rights strongly enough. This could be an opportunity to put those critics to rest. On the other hand, the Obama Administration has put a much higher priority on the Turkish-American relationship than the Bush Administration did, and Obama will need the Turks’ cooperation if he plans to withdraw from Iraq in 2011. Look for Obama to cave in.
It will also be interesting to see how Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu reacts to the vote in the Foreign Affairs Committee, which will almost certainly pass the resolution. Davutoglu has been radically revamping Turkish foreign policy to make it friendlier, but seems to have reached a roadblock on the Turkish-Armenian front. Expect him to make the argument that such a move by America would harm progress in talks to restart formal Turkish-Armenian relations.
Comments
Leave a Reply
Loading
